Ronald Wimmer
2017-04-19 08:03:12 UTC
Hi,
I am implementing automounted home shares for all my IPA users. When
thinking a little more about the topic two fundamental questions arose:
- Is it a good idea to automount /home even if no local users exist at
the moment?
- Would it be better to leave local users in /home and place IPA users
to e.g. /mnt/ipausers/home
In both cases an IPA user would have 1 homedirectory for all ipa
machines. This would mean 1 set of configuration files for RHEL 6/7,
CentOS 6/7, Suse, Ubuntu and maybe some new distros to come at some
point in time. Is this a good idea?
How to solve the problem that some files (e.g. .profile or
.bash_history) do only make sense on a per-host basis whereas others can
be centrally managed?
Your thoughts on this matter are highly appreciated!
Regards,
Ronald
I am implementing automounted home shares for all my IPA users. When
thinking a little more about the topic two fundamental questions arose:
- Is it a good idea to automount /home even if no local users exist at
the moment?
- Would it be better to leave local users in /home and place IPA users
to e.g. /mnt/ipausers/home
In both cases an IPA user would have 1 homedirectory for all ipa
machines. This would mean 1 set of configuration files for RHEL 6/7,
CentOS 6/7, Suse, Ubuntu and maybe some new distros to come at some
point in time. Is this a good idea?
How to solve the problem that some files (e.g. .profile or
.bash_history) do only make sense on a per-host basis whereas others can
be centrally managed?
Your thoughts on this matter are highly appreciated!
Regards,
Ronald
--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project